Primary Author: Mr. Ronald J. Rider and Mr. Rod Charles Carter CCP PSP
Audience Focus: Advanced
Application Type: Application
Venue: 2014 AACE International Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, USA
Abstract: AACE International’s Recommended Practices for Forensic Schedule Analysis (29R-03) and Time Impact Analysis - As Applied in Construction (52R-06) provide general guidelines for inserting delay events to impact a schedule. In practice, creating and adding delay events and modeling their schedule impacts can be quite complex, especially on highly impacted oil & gas projects that span several years. This paper discusses the inherent complexities and provides practical considerations and methods for:
The methods discussed in this paper are drawn from the authors’ experience in implementing retrospective Time Impact Analyses (MIP 3.7 Modeled/Additive/Multiple Base) on large EPC oil and gas project disputes. The examples are drawn from a 6,000-activity schedule on a gas plant project impacted by hundreds of changes and delayed by 16 months.
Audience Focus: Advanced
Application Type: Application
Venue: 2014 AACE International Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, USA
Abstract: AACE International’s Recommended Practices for Forensic Schedule Analysis (29R-03) and Time Impact Analysis - As Applied in Construction (52R-06) provide general guidelines for inserting delay events to impact a schedule. In practice, creating and adding delay events and modeling their schedule impacts can be quite complex, especially on highly impacted oil & gas projects that span several years. This paper discusses the inherent complexities and provides practical considerations and methods for:
- Creating fragnet activities and statusing them across multiple analysis windows
- Quantifying extended durations to account for additional work
- Tying fragnets to impacted activities using Finish-to-Finish (FF) logic
- Evaluating Contractor-responsible delays that are embedded in Owner-responsible events
The methods discussed in this paper are drawn from the authors’ experience in implementing retrospective Time Impact Analyses (MIP 3.7 Modeled/Additive/Multiple Base) on large EPC oil and gas project disputes. The examples are drawn from a 6,000-activity schedule on a gas plant project impacted by hundreds of changes and delayed by 16 months.