Costs to construct pavements for building
or infrastructure projects present challenges to the cost engineer and
designer when selecting the lower cost alternative. Concrete pavements
traditionally have a higher initial cost than asphalt pavements,
however, concrete usually has a longer life and lower long-term
maintenance costs. Concrete pavements may have different base structures
to enhance their useful life and minimize long-term maintenance. The
purpose of this paper is to present a comparative analysis of concrete
pavements having different base structures to assist cost engineers and
designers in linking total life-cycle costs with actual performance.
Different pavement base structures used in the analysis consist of a
standard aggregate base and a modified high-performance aggregate base.
The life-cycle cost analysis found that a plain dense-graded aggregate
base provided the lower cost alternative than modified base alternatives
for concrete pavement. A modified base having drainable aggregate had a
lower surface roughness, but was 10% more expensive when total life
cycle costs were considered. A better performing asphalt-treated base
was estimated to be 29% more expensive than a standard plain base.