Skip to main content

Enhancing continuing education and professional development

Events
Courses
Video Go
Search
Sign Up
Sign In

Item Added to Cart

You just added

You have item(s) in your cart

  • Proceed to Checkout
  1. Courses
  2. (PR) State & Federal Courts...
  3. (PR) State & Federal Courts...

    (PR) State & Federal Courts Series: Remote Courts & Access to Justice (Module 5 of 6)

    Loading video

    This video is currently being processed. It will be ready for viewing shortly.

    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    A small thumbnail of this item.
    • Overview

    Thank you

    This live web event has ended. Thank you for attending.

    Description

    Course Description: (PR Credit)
    Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, remote hearings have become the new normal for many judges and litigants. A panel of international experts will discuss the rapid expansion of remote courts, the impact on court users, and the promise and pitfalls of online courts to achieve equal access to justice for all.

    Learning Objectives:
    As a result of this course, participants will be able to:
    1. Compare the advantages and disadvantages of remote courts in improving access to
        justice.
    2. Identify available technology and prepare for the long-term use of remote courts.

    Professional Competencies:
    Category II:  Informed and Impartial Decision Maker
    Knowledge of the Law and Justice System:
    Understands the legal and operational matters relevant to the assignment. Builds knowledge from relevant disciplines and understands their implication in daily work.

    Category III: Leader of the Court Process
    Managing the Case and the Court Process:
    Directs docket and courtroom operations by planning and coordinating schedules, managing case processing timelines and facilitating information exchange between parties in a case, court staff and other stakeholders.

    Contributors

    • Dr. Natalie Byrom, Director of Research, The Legal Education Foundation

      Dr. Natalie Byrom is Director of Research at The Legal Education Foundation, an independent charitable foundation based in London which awards grants to organizations that support individuals to understand and use the law as a tool for positive change.

      In 2020, the Foundation announced the development of a new strategic initiative, the UK Access to Justice Lab, which aims to improve the evidence base for what works in the design and operation of the justice system, and address gaps in research about the outcomes people secure in relation to their legal problems.

      Dr Byrom is part of the BBC Expert Women Network and her writing has been featured in the national and legal press. She sits on the Administrative Justice Council and has been seconded to the UK government as Expert Advisor on Open Data and Academic Engagement. Her final report to government set out a series of recommendations for the ways in which the data architecture underpinning online court projects should be developed to ensure that access to justice is upheld and enhanced.

      In 2020 she led a rapid consultation for the Civil Justice Council which aimed to explore the impact of COVID-19 on the Civil Justice System. At time of publication, this consultation was the largest study of the experience of remote hearings conducted in the UK.

    • James McMillan, National Center for State Courts

      James E. McMillan is one of the world’s leading court technologists with 40 years of experience in the field. He directed the Court Technology Laboratory and was co-founder of the Courtroom 21 project at William and Mary School of Law. McMillan has provided consulting expertise in all 50 state courts in the USA and internationally to courts in more than 20 countries along with UN International Criminal Tribunals in The Hague, Netherlands and Arusha, Tanzania.

      James is currently editor of the Court Technology Bulletin blog for the NCSC, http://courttechbulletin.blogspot.com/

    • Judith Resnik, Yale Law School

      Judith Resnik is the Arthur Liman Professor of Law at Yale Law School and the Founding Director of the Liman Center for Public Interest Law. She teaches courses on federalism, procedure, courts, prisons, equality, and citizenship. Her scholarship focuses on the relationship of democratic values to government services such as courts, prisons, and post offices; the roles of collective redress, class actions, and arbitration; contemporary conflicts over privatization; the relationships of states to citizens and non-citizens; the forms and norms of federalism; and equality and gender.

      In 2018, Professor Resnik received an Andrew Carnegie Fellowship, a two-year award to enable her to complete research and write a new book, Impermissible Punishments, which explores the impact of the 1960s civil rights revolution on the kinds of punishments that governments can impose on people convicted of crimes. In 2018, she was also awarded an honorary doctorate from University College London.

      Professor Resnik's prior books include Representing Justice: Invention, Controversy, and Rights in City-States and Democratic Courtrooms (with Dennis Curtis, Yale University Press, 2011); Federal Courts Stories (co-edited with Vicki C. Jackson, Foundation Press, 2010); and Migrations and Mobilities: Citizenship, Borders, and Gender (co-edited with Seyla Benhabib, NYU, 2009). In 2014, Resnik was the co-editor (with Linda Greenhouse) of the Daedalus volume, The Invention of Courts.

      Representing Justice
      received numerous awards for its exploration of the evolution of adjudication into its modern form. Through mapping the remarkable run of the political icon of Justice and tracking the development of public spaces – courthouses – dedicated to justice, Resnik and Curtis analyzed how Renaissance “rites” of judgment turned into democratic “rights,” requiring governments to protect judicial independence and to provide open and public hearings. With more than 220 images, readers can see the longevity of aspirations for legitimate state-based adjudication and the expansion of government services and come to appreciate that, while venerable, courts are also vulnerable institutions that ought (like the post office and the press) not be taken for granted. In 2011, Representing Justice was selected by The Guardian as one of the year’s “best legal reads;” in 2012, it was chosen by the American Publishers Association as the recipient of two PROSE awards for excellence in social sciences and in law/legal studies, and by the American Society of Legal Writers for the 2012 SCRIBES award. In 2014, Representing Justice won the Order of the Coif award, presented every two years in recognition of a book’s outstanding contributions to legal scholarship.

      Resnik’s recent book chapters and articles include The Functions of Publicity and of Privatization in Courts and Their Replacements (from Jeremy Bentham to #MeToo and Google Spain) (Max Planck Institute, Luxembourg, Nomos, 2019); Accommodations, Discounts, and Displacement: The Variability of Rights as a Norm of Federalism(s) (Jus Politicum, 2017); Bordering by Law: The Migration of Law, Crimes, Sovereignty, and the Mail (Nomos LVII: Immigration, Emigration, and Migration, 2017); Revising Our “Common Intellectual Heritage” (Notre Dame Law Review, 2016); and Diffusing Disputes: The Public in the Private of Arbitration, the Private in Courts, and the Erasure of Rights (Yale Law Journal, 2015).
      Professor Resnik now chairs Yale Law School’s Global Constitutional Law Seminar, a part of the Gruber Program on Global Justice and Women’s Rights. The private seminar brings together jurists from around the world and provides an annual set of readings that are, in essence, case books on pressing issues of constitutional law. Resnik is the editor of the volumes which, since 2012 when she became the chair, have been published as e-books. They include Global Reconfigurations, Constitutional Obligations, and Everyday Life (2018), Reconstituting Constitutional Orders (2017), and The Reach of Rights (2015), and are available at https://documents.law.yale.edu/global-constitutionalism-seminar.

      Professor Resnik founded Yale’s Arthur Liman Center for Public Interest Law, which supports one-year fellowships for Yale Law School graduates as well as summer fellowships for students at Barnard, Brown, Bryn Mawr, Harvard, Princeton, Spelman, Stanford, and Yale. From its inception in 1997 through 2020, 152 graduates of Yale Law School have held Liman Fellowships. Each year, the Liman Center sponsors colloquia and teaches seminars on the civil and criminal justice systems.
      Students and faculty in the Liman Center also work on projects related to incarceration and the challenges of the justice system for individuals with limited resources. For example, the Liman Center has joined with the Association of State Correctional Administrators (ASCA) in a series of reports on solitary confinement, in which prisoners are held for 22 hours or more in their cells, for 15 days or longer.

      In 2013, ASCA and Liman researched all fifty states’ rules governing placement in isolation and learned that policies made it easy to be placed into confinement and focused little on insuring release from segregation. In 2015, ASCA and the Liman Center co-authored Time-in-Cell: The ASCA-Liman 2014 National Survey of Administrative Segregation in Prison. The report was the first to provide updated information, as of the fall of 2014, on both the numbers of people (80,000 to 100,000) and the conditions in solitary confinement nationwide. Since then, Liman and ASCA have undertaken follow-up services to provide a unique longitudinal database on the use of what correctional officials call “restrictive housing.” The reports include Aiming to Reduce Time-In-Cell: Reports from Correctional Systems on the Numbers of Prisoners in Restricted Housing and on the Potential of Policy Changes to Bring About Reforms (2016); Rethinking Death Row (2016); Reforming Restrictive Housing: The 2018 ASCA-Liman Nationwide Survey of Time-in-Cell, and its companion volume, Working to Limit Restrictive Housing: Efforts in Four Jurisdictions to Make Changes, both published in 2018. All of these volumes are available at https://law.yale.edu/centers-workshops/arthur-liman-center-public-interest-law/liman-center-publications.

      The 2018 research survey estimated that 61,000 people in prison were held in-cell for an average of 22 hours or more for 15 days or more. Reporting jurisdictions counted more than 3,500 people who had been held in solitary for more than three years. ASCA-Liman has also identified a significant shift in governing policies. Once, prison administrators saw solitary as the solution to disciplinary issues in prison. Today, many prison leaders are joining in the national and international view that solitary is itself a problem to be solved through abolition or substantial limitations on its use.
      Another project of the Liman Center includes researching the challenges that women face while incarcerated. In February of 2019, Professor Resnik joined nineteen other witnesses to testify before the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights at its hearing on women in prison.

      The Liman Center also has several initiatives focused on economic injustice and the courts. Professor Resnik chaired the 2018 Colloquium, Who Pays? Fines, Fees, Bail, and the Cost of Courts, and co-taught the 2018 Liman workshop, Rationing Access to Justice in Democracies. The 2019 Liman seminar, Poverty and the Courts: Fines, Fees, Bail, and Collective Redress, continued to explore these issues.
      In March of 2019, the Arthur Liman Center for Public Interest Law, joined by the Policy Advocacy Clinic at UC Berkeley and the Fines and Fees Justice Center, focused on these challenges at the 22nd annual Liman Center Colloquium, Economic Injustice: Courts, Law Schools, and Institutionalizing Reforms, and in the Colloquium’s publication, Ability to Pay, which aim to bring the economics of court services and the needs of courts and litigants into the mainstream of legal education. These books are available at https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/area/center/liman/document/liman_colloquium_book_combined_cover_march_21_2019.pdf

      Professor Resnik is a member of national and international organizations dedicated to law, courts, and social justice. She has chaired the American Association of Law Schools’ Sections on Procedure, on Federal Courts, and on Women in Legal Education. She is a Managerial Trustee of the International Association of Women Judges. Professor Resnik served as a founder and, for more than a decade, as a co-chair of Yale University’s Women Faculty Forum, begun in 2001.
      Professor Resnik is also an occasional litigator. She argued Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Carpenter, decided in 2009 by the United States Supreme Court; and in the 1987 case about admission of women to the Rotary Club. She also regularly files amici briefs in areas related to her expertise. Professor Resnik has testified before Congress, before rulemaking committees of the federal judiciary, and before the House of Commons of Canada.

      From 2014 to 2016, Professor Resnik was a Phi Beta Kappa Visiting Scholar, travelling to various liberal arts colleges in the United States. In 2015, she was a visiting professor at Université Panthéon-Assas Paris II, to which she will return in 2020; she is also an honorary visiting professor at University College London.

      In 1998, Professor Resnik was the recipient of the Margaret Brent Women Lawyers of Achievement Award from the Commission on Women of the American Bar Association. In 2001, she was elected a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and in 2002, she became a member of the American Philosophical Society, where she delivered the Henry LaBarre Jayne Lecture in 2005. In 2008, Professor Resnik was named Outstanding Scholar of the Year by the Fellows of the American Bar Foundation. In 2010, she received the Elizabeth Hurlock Beckman Prize, awarded to outstanding faculty in higher education in the fields of psychology or law. That year, Professor Resnik also had a cameo role in the Doug Liman film, Fair Game. In 2013, Professor Resnik was given the Arabella Babb Mansfield Award, the highest honor presented by the National Association of Women Lawyers. In 2017, she was honored by former Liman fellows with the establishment of the Resnik-Curtis Fellowship in Public Interest Law.

    • Honorable Carl Anthony Walker, Justice, 1st Appellate District, Illinois

      The Honorable Justice Carl Anthony Walker is a native Chicagoan, and he is admitted to the practice of law in both Illinois and Iowa. Assigned to the First District Illinois Appellate Court, he serves as the Presiding Justice of the First Division. Immediately prior to his assignment to the appellate court, Justice Walker served in the Law Division Tax & Miscellaneous Remedies Section and as the Supervising Judge of the Surety Section of the Circuit Court of Cook County.

      Justice Walker has served as a faculty member for Supreme Court of Illinois Judicial College continuing judicial education programs, including the Education Conference since 2010. He has lectured for the Judicial Council of the National Bar Association and has been a panelist for the Joint Federal/State Judicial Conference. Notably, Justice Walker has been admitted into the Distinguished Service Chapter of Phi Beta Sigma Fraternity, Inc. because of his extraordinary service to the fraternity and the community at large. His community service includes preparing eighth grade students to pass the Algebra Exit Exam.

      Currently, Justice Walker serves on the Reconstituted Illinois Judicial Conference and liaison to the Commission on Professionalism. He also serves with the Committee on Judicial Education, Legislative Committee, Juvenile Courts Committee, Ethics Committee, First District Appellate Court Rules Committee, Disparate Impact Workgroup of Juvenile Courts, and Diversity & Inclusion Workgroup of the Committee on Judicial Education

      Justice Walker matriculated through the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, where he received an academic achievement award and served as a Resident Advisor. After earning an undergraduate degree in Accounting, he became a Certified Public Accountant. Subsequently, he attended The University of Iowa College of Law, where he served on the Iowa Law Review and as Vice President of the law school class. Justice Walker’s efforts to make the atmosphere more hospitable to students of all backgrounds made him a recipient of the law school’s prestigious Human Rights Award. He is a past president of the Illinois Judicial Council, and board member of the Illinois Judges Association.

    October 22, 2020
    Thu 1:00 PM CDT

    Duration 2H 0M

    This live web event has ended.

    For Technical Support
    support@blueskyelearn.com
    +1 (858) 201-4136
    Register
    Log In
    • New
    • Existing

    Forgot password?

    You finished this item!

    • Go back to course
    • Go to next item
    • Events
    • Courses
    • Search
    • Support
    • Judicial College Website
    • Sign Up
    • Sign In
    • Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy