Description
1) Converting Market Research & Metrics into Smarter
Marketing and Outreach
Butch Kinerney, FEMA,
Eugene.Kinerney@fema.dhs.gov
Co-presenters: None
Abstract: This presentation will inform State and local
officials the potential for flood insurance policy growth based on market
segmentation research and the results of the FY22 National Flood Insurance
Program’s (NFIP) Hurricane Season Marketing Campaign, specifically in North
Carolina. Over the last two years, the
NFIP’s Marketing and Outreach Branch (M&O) has developed a market
segmentation methodology to better target consumers to purchase a flood
insurance policy. This methodology, which includes data sets on flood risk and
affordability, allows for M&O to plan for and execute marketing campaigns
using the latest digital advertising tools and technology. The Marketing Rule of 7
states that a consumer needs to “hear” or “see” the message at least 7 times
before they take action. M&O’s paid marketing campaign, in addition to
other marketing tactics, is a public information program to raise consumer
awareness of flood risk. The Rule of 7 is achieved by applying digital
marketing as a risk communication tool. For example, the FY22
Hurricane Season campaign launched in North Carolina garnered over 63 million
media impressions from April 25 to September 28, 2022. A media impression is every
time a consumer “hears” or “sees” a FloodSmart Ad. However, there is still much
needed partnership between State, local and the agent community to attain
policy growth and resiliency in North Carolina. This presentation will
encourage attendees to explore partnerships and brainstorm additional marketing
and outreach tactics to convert research and metrics to flood insurance
policies.
2) Worldwide Lessons and Insights from Flood Risk and Mitigation
Communication
Christine Gralher,
PE, CFM, Jacobs,
christine.gralher@jacobs.com
Co-presenters: Paul Robinson, Paul.Robinson@jacobs.com
Abstract: It is essential
to make flood risk information readily available to the public, especially as
climate change threatens to increase flood losses. An important piece of
resilience and preparedness planning is regularly evaluating flood data and
communicating the associated risks. While focusing on hazards arising from big
coastal storms and sea level rise, many overlook the risks of flooding from
other sources. After Hurricane Katrina, thousands moved further inland and
rebuilt their lives in Baton Rouge, only to be flooded by a storm dumping heavy
rain almost exactly eleven years later. Communities in upland areas, such as
Appalachia, might feel safe from flooding, however, the region’s mountainous
topography can put communities at risk of higher velocity flood flows. This can
be exacerbated where the landscape is scarred by coal mining or wildfire,
contributing to flash floods. This is why awareness and communication of flood
risk is so important. In the United States, several online resources are
available to the public, these however, require web access that might not be
available to all demographics. For those that have access, many rely on FEMA’s
Flood Insurance Studies without being aware that these studies do not take
future conditions, long-term erosion, or flood asset conditions into
account. This presentation asks what
innovations there are in other parts of the world and explores how flood risk
data is publicly shared and explained to increase flood awareness, and support
mitigation efforts that increase the resilience and preparedness of
communities. It will highlight how outreach and flood risk education is done
across different demographics and cultures and shares the obstacles and
difficulties uncovered during the worldwide comparison. The lessons learned
will offer insights into improvements we may make in the US as we seek to
increase flood awareness and improve flood management planning.
3) Understanding Behavioral Science and its Opportunities in Building Resilience
Griffin Smith, Ogilvy, griffin.smith@ogilvy.com
Co-presenters: Skye King; skye.king@ogilvy.com
Abstract: Behavioral science helps explain why individuals and communities make (or do not make) decisions to bolster their resilience. Natural hazards offer a powerful case to show how different behavioral biases can impact decisions.
By offering a lens to understand and support communities in making resilient decisions around natural hazards—behavior science can give us insights into how and why people choose to prepare in advance, proactively evacuate, rebuild things as they were or rebuild stronger, and to even consider relocating. This talk will demonstrate ways in which behavioral science shapes decisions around resilience at large. It will also highlight the role of different biases in decision making processes and how to navigate around these biases to support individuals and communities to become more resilient. Attendees will leave better able to understand these biases and use them in their own work.