Skip to main content

Part 3 - Convince Me

Thank you

Our live webcast has ended. If you were not able to attend on the day of the webcast, or if you purchased the e-learn product, you may watch the video to earn full CLE credit. Once you have completed the video, you will be directed to the next item to obtain your certificate.

Expires: May 1, 2024
Part 3 - Convince Me
How convincing are you? From time to time, all lawyers must convince someone of something, whether in contract negotiations or litigation. In this program, Part 3 of Logic, Argumentation, and Persuasion, we’ll show you how to use classical logical syllogisms to construct more compelling arguments. We’ll consider formal logical fallacies that undermine your proposition and reduce your chances for success. We’ll review convincing syllogisms from several recent SCOTUS cases. We’ll use this information to help you construct more convincing, logical arguments and enhance your credibility in litigation and transactional practice, and even in casual conversations. You’ll learn this and more:
  • The differences between conditional, categorical, and disjunctive syllogisms, and when to use each
  • How to construct a valid syllogism
  • Six different kinds of formal logical fallacies, and how to avoid them
  • When to use deductive reasoning
  • When to use inductive reasoning
  • How data differs from information
Program Creator and Speaker: Lenné Eidson Espenschied, Next Level Contracts

Description

June 16th  1:00 – 2:00pm
Part 3 - Convince Me
How convincing are you? From time to time, all lawyers must convince someone of something, whether in contract negotiations or litigation. In this program, Part 3 of Logic, Argumentation, and Persuasion, we’ll show you how to use classical logical syllogisms to construct more compelling arguments. We’ll consider formal logical fallacies that undermine your proposition and reduce your chances for success. We’ll review convincing syllogisms from several recent SCOTUS cases. We’ll use this information to help you construct more convincing, logical arguments and enhance your credibility in litigation and transactional practice, and even in casual conversations. You’ll learn this and more:
  • The differences between conditional, categorical, and disjunctive syllogisms, and when to use each
  • How to construct a valid syllogism
  • Six different kinds of formal logical fallacies, and how to avoid them
  • When to use deductive reasoning
  • When to use inductive reasoning
  • How data differs from information
Program Creator and Speaker: Lenné Eidson Espenschied, Next Level Contracts

Contributors

  • Lenné Eidson Espenschied

    Next Level Contracts, Saint Simons Island, Georgia

    Lenné Eidson Espenschied practiced law in Atlanta, Georgia for 25 years, focusing on corporate and transactional representation of technology-based businesses. She is the author of two books published by the American Bar Association: Contract Drafting: Powerful Prose in Transactional Practice (ABA Fundamentals, 2010) and The Grammar and Writing Handbook for Lawyers (ABA Fundamentals, 2011). After graduating from the University of Georgia School of Law magna cum laude, Ms. Espenschied began her legal practice at Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan; she also served as Senior Counsel in the legal department of Bank of America before eventually opening her own law office. Ms. Espenschied has taught commercial law, contracts, and contract drafting at Charlotte School of Law and at the University of Georgia. She is a frequent speaker at continuing legal education seminars and provides private training at law firms and corporate legal departments. Her passion is helping younger lawyers acquire the skills they need to be successful in transactional practice.


June 16, 2022
Thu 1:00 PM CDT

Duration 1H 0M

This live web event has ended.

You can access this item by buying entire section

Buy entire section:

Event Support
(888) 487-2026