Thank you
This live web event has ended. Thank you for attending.
Description
| Defining Combustible Dust Learning Objectives | |
| John discussed the importance of understanding learning objectives and the potential for confusion due to differences in definitions between the US and Europe in the field of combustible dust. They emphasized the need for precise language and clarified the definitions of terms such as 'explosion' according to NFPA standards. John also highlighted the absence of a lower velocity limit in some standards and suggested a complete definition should include a lower velocity limit, a pressure criterion, and a thermal criterion. They also mentioned their consulting work, which primarily involves personnel safety, and noted the importance of specificity in definitions. | |
| Dust Cloud Combustion Dynamics and Hazards | |
| John elaborated on the dynamics of dust cloud combustion, emphasizing the crucial role of unburnt dust being propelled ahead of the flame front. They detailed the expansion of gases during combustion and the significance of the universal gas law in understanding how a fire affects a building, compartment, or process vessel. John highlighted the dangers of rapid temperature increases causing gas expansion and structural failure, leading to personal injuries. They underscored the conditions necessary for a declaration, stressing the importance of combustible solid with sufficiently small particle size, its suspension in air or another oxidizing medium, a sufficiently high concentration, and a competent igniter. John concluded by stating that they would focus on managing the declaration hazard to prevent an explosion. They also discussed the causes and dangers of dust explosions in industrial settings, using the example of an incident at Imperial Sugar. They stressed the importance of facility surveys to identify potential explosion hazards and the need for caution. John concluded by noting that OSHA and others have embraced the term "combustible dust", implying that testing is necessary to determine if a material is a combustible dust. | |
| Combustible Dust: Labeling, Testing, and Protective Clothing | |
| John discussed the importance of accurately labeling particulate as combustible dust. They recommended using a 500 micron size criterion instead of a 420 micron size, and suggested testing and microscopic examination of particulates to understand their behavior. John emphasized the need to identify four specific conditions in a building compartment to determine if a declaration hazard exists. They also explained the terms "detonation" and "flashfire", noting that detonations cause devastating damage due to the brittle fracture of enclosures, while "flashfire" refers to a brief flash of flame in a fuel suspension of limited volume. John suggested that suitable protective clothing could prevent personnel injury. The Technical Committee agreed to define 'flash fire' loosely, which led to significant dissension in combustible dust technical committees. | |
| Hybrid Mixture and Metrics in NFPA 60 Standard | |
| John discussed the terminology and metrics related to Nfpa 6, 60 standard. They emphasized the concept of a hybrid mixture, which is a flammable gas mixed with either combustible dust or mist. John specified that the mixture must be above 10% of its lower flammable limit to constitute a hybrid. They stressed the importance of test data for designing deflagration hazard management due to hybrids being worse than their individual components. John also explained various metrics used to measure the ignition and flammability of dust, such as the Lower Flammable Limit, the Minimum Ignition Energy, and the Maximum Deflagration Pressure. They introduced the Declaration Index or Dust Constant, which is a normalized rate of pressure increase, but noted it should not be the sole indicator. John also discussed the concept of reduced pressure and its role in vent design, explaining that it's the pressure the vessel is expected to survive. They also introduced the static activation pressure, which is the pressure of an event that event relieves at, when the pressure is relieved slowly. | |
| Combustion Concepts and Fuel Classification | |
| John discussed the concept of auto ignition temperature and its use in assessing the likelihood of a deflagration under certain conditions. They then moved on to discuss chemical kinetics, particularly the combustion reaction in building compartments. John explained that the heat release is calculated from the change in the net heat of formation and assumed a stoichiometric reaction. They also addressed the issue of incomplete combustion and the use of test data. John then classified fuels into various categories, including organic fuels, irregular fuels, and metals. They emphasized the need to consider all metals as combustible, with the exception of gold and palladium. | |
| Combustion Kinetics and Hazard Recognition | |
| John discussed the basics of combustion kinetics and its application in understanding the impacts of combustion processes. They explained that combustion can lead to a volume expansion or pressure increase, with the dominant contributor being the liberated heat. John also highlighted that the specific heats of the reaction's participants are crucial for calculating the maximum theoretical temperature, which they noted is often lower than the actual temperature due to endothermic pre-combustion processes. They concluded the discussion by emphasizing the importance of hazard recognition in managing dust explosion hazards. | |
| Combustion Rate Equation and Material Testing | |
| John discussed the dangers of burning solids on external surfaces, with a focus on four main criteria. They explained the combustion rate equation and its dependencies on surface area, mass, and net heat to combustion, as well as the importance of particle size and shape. John emphasized the need to test materials in their actual environments to assess their potential to propagate deflagration and cautioned against relying solely on vendor data, as the material's properties can change when put into the process. | |
| Dust Concentration Hazards and Precautions | |
| John discussed the behavior of dust concentrations and their potential hazards. They highlighted the importance of understanding the concentration levels and their potential for ignition, emphasizing the potential health effects of long-term accumulation of respirable dust and the risk of secondary explosions. John also mentioned the obscuring effect of dust layers, particularly when the concentration reaches around 100 grams per cubic meter, and the hazards of combustible dust in industrial settings. They emphasized the need to determine how much dust is too much, focusing on whether the dust has reached the angle of repose, and the potential consequences of dust dispersion. John cautioned about ignition sources such as mechanical work on particulates and emphasized the need for safe practices in such environments. | |
| Dust Explosion Hazards in Manufacturing | |
| John discussed the potential for dust explosions in manufacturing processes, particularly with the use of milling cutters. They detailed the sequence of a dust explosion, emphasizing the role of dust accumulation in propagating the declaration and causing personnel injuries. John highlighted the importance of understanding the mechanisms of dust suspension and the propagation of the declaration in multi-compartment facilities. They also stressed the need for controlling or limiting the release of accumulated fugitive dust to prevent property damage and personal injury. John announced that the next session would focus on hazard recognition. |